Page 1 of 2

Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:34 am
by rapidfire25
well any ways I feel there should be a posting area where we can place "bets" ( no actual money) for when ww3 will officially start you can give vague answers like the next thousand years although you will get more praise if your answer is decidedly closer to the actual date. :D You are also free to theorize the cause for bonus points.

My guess next 5 years, because some one does something stupid in the scs by accident .

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 2:21 am
by Encyclopath
Well, I'd bet that in retrospect, it will be said that it already had started by now (compare Donbass/crimea to czechoslovakia in ww2, and syria to the spanish civil war). The Poland analogy is yet to be made, but within the next 5-7 years.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:09 am
by jayfeather31
I'm going to guess a Russian Invasion in the Baltics, prompted by Hilary Clinton sending military aid and troops to Ukraine, starting on August 6, 2017. A secondary bet in my opinion would involve India and Pakistan, to which I would guess would occur sometime on January 26, 2017; the day India created the Constitution of India, in which Pakistan launches troops directly into Kashmir when India falsely accuses Pakistan of a major terrorist attack in Mumbai, and sends a small division to advance beyond the line of control.

Those are my guesses, and while they're probably going to be false, that's my position.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:17 am
by Drumboy44
Will somehow involve Germany.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:19 am
by matty1053
The good ol' classic WW3 scenario? Nukes flying? I have a little doubt.


I'd say a 45% chance. We will have to see post election.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 3:41 am
by Encyclopath
matty1053 wrote:The good ol' classic WW3 scenario? Nukes flying? I have a little doubt.


I'd say a 45% chance. We will have to see post election.
Would it have to involve nukes? It's conceivable that a major full scale war could occur, and MAD would continue to deter escalation, provided no nuclear power is itself being invaded.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 5:01 am
by Harbinger
Would it have to involve nukes? It's conceivable that a major full scale war could occur, and MAD would continue to deter escalation, provided no nuclear power is itself being invaded.
It would never stay conventional for long. The US would forward deploy its carriers in an effort to power project, and several would likely be sunk by Russian subs with loss of most, if not all, hands. America's efforts would become unhinged rapidly if that occurred, and the US would be forced to escalate to use of nuclear weapons in order to try to scare the Russians into peace, since the US would no longer be able to win the war by conventional means. Hell, even if the carriers were untouchable, you would still have to reinforce Europe with ground forces, and doing it one Abrams tank at a time by aircraft is impossible. There would be a mass haul of armored assets by ship at some point, and if a single sub got past the ASW screen and sank a divisions worth of armor on those Ro/Ro's, the effect would be devastating to the NATO effort. They'd have no choice but to resort to nukes.

My bet is on the US picking a fight with Russia or China or both, and potentially very soon. These guys seem compelled to start the war ASAP, and seem disappointed that Russia has not started it yet as response to some of the ridiculous stunts we've been pulling. My bet is also on the carrier battle groups being more vulnerable than it's popularly believed, stealth aircraft being less effective than thought, and Russian weapons being more effective than thought. Losses would become extreme on our side quite rapidly in event of full-scale war, something we are not prepared for, and would cause panic in whatever is left of the pentagon after being hit with a dozen stealth cruise missiles. Nuclear exchange would ensue rapidly. Days probably, a week or two at most.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:07 am
by Obreid
I agree in terms of US trying to provoke. Either or gets poked frequently. One thing not mentioned recently is the economic realities effecting all players. Starting a war to compensate for a economic weakness is not unheard of that or using the war to stimulate the declining economy. Not saying it's a smart thing to do but it has happend.
If not money how about a years supply of dehydrated food for two. Not sure how it would be delivered after it all goes south.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:54 am
by hrng
Oswald wrote:Bets involving WW3 are completely meaningless. Win or Lose- how does one collect?
You collect internet points that can be cashed in to your local trader for bottle caps in the event of an apocalypse.

Re: Bets on world war 3

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:37 am
by joe1971
Drumboy44 wrote:Will somehow involve Germany.
I see what you did there 8-) :lol: