Do you trust the media to properly inform you of an impending nuclear crisis?

Defense related and not covered in the other categories? Then it goes here.

Do you trust the media to properly inform you of an impending nuclear crisis?

You may select 1 option

 
 
View results
RichardWad
.
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 6:25 pm

Tue Sep 10, 2019 3:00 am

Yeah, no. All media lies. There is so much news they are blatantly ignoring. It was bad before, now it is another level. Cut cable cord 10 years ago and am so glad I did.

What I would really like is for our government to give us assurances the Emergency Alert system will be activated if an attack is imminent.

User avatar
DEFCONWarningSystem
Director
Director
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:26 pm
Contact:

Tue Sep 10, 2019 3:46 am

RichardWad wrote:
Tue Sep 10, 2019 3:00 am
What I would really like is for our government to give us assurances the Emergency Alert system will be activated if an attack is imminent.
That's actually an interesting question.

There is some theory in the US that, pending a nuclear crisis, an order to evacuate cities would have signaled to Russia that the US is preparing for nuclear war, so the US may not actually give the order and thus attempt to not escalate the situation further.

Could the same be said about the EAS? Would warning the public about nuclear war inflame the situation further to a paranoid enemy?

RichardWad
.
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 6:25 pm

Tue Sep 10, 2019 4:02 am

We had a test in Hawaii last year on this. They called it a mistake. Yet we all know, there is no way it was.
The public in HI apparently didn't panic. Which is odd, because I sure as hell would have. I just don't get the sense people at large understand what nuclear attack imminent means. 50 years ago, everyone knew what it meant and what to do.

The reason I pose the question is I feel like we (public) should have a backup system in place, because we have never been able to trust our government.

C Herrington

Tue Sep 10, 2019 12:26 pm

I Think that the UK Gov for sure would not tell the public at large, due to the fact that with the new Russian Hyper Ballistic Missile it can hit the UK in 15-20MINS. Leaving little to no time to respond to these type of threats. even if we could track the incoming missiles, they would be coming so fast that it would be very hard to intercept and destroy them.

The media lie's and are constantly putting brain dead idiots on the screen to keep the sheep occupied with trivial news or super-stars and avoid telling the public about what is actually going on in the world. they don't mention the Genocide in Indonesia, nor what the Chinese are up to. they don't mention much about the Crisis in Kashmir Provence.they don't mention the fact the Israel has Occupied much of Palestine inducing Jerusalem

so no i don't trust the media one bit, the only way to stay informed is with proper research that has multiple outlets to verify its authenticity.
so like others have said it would be nice to rely on genuine information that i can make a good informed choice on to take steps to secure me and my family's safety

willrod1989
.
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:07 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:57 pm

RichardWad wrote:
Tue Sep 10, 2019 4:02 am
We had a test in Hawaii last year on this. They called it a mistake. Yet we all know, there is no way it was.
The public in HI apparently didn't panic. Which is odd, because I sure as hell would have. I just don't get the sense people at large understand what nuclear attack imminent means. 50 years ago, everyone knew what it meant and what to do.

The reason I pose the question is I feel like we (public) should have a backup system in place, because we have never been able to trust our government.
Interestingly put. I have actually talked to quite a few people about a theory that a missile was actually inbound, but destroyed. And rather than further escalate the incident, the government claims it was a "false alarm". Does anyone else feel this might be the case?

User avatar
DEFCONWarningSystem
Director
Director
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:26 pm
Contact:

Sat Sep 14, 2019 9:38 pm

willrod1989 wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:57 pm
Interestingly put. I have actually talked to quite a few people about a theory that a missile was actually inbound, but destroyed. And rather than further escalate the incident, the government claims it was a "false alarm". Does anyone else feel this might be the case?
No. There is no evidence of an incoming missile. It really was just a screw up.

willrod1989
.
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:07 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Sat Sep 14, 2019 9:59 pm

DEFCONWarningSystem wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 9:38 pm
willrod1989 wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:57 pm
Interestingly put. I have actually talked to quite a few people about a theory that a missile was actually inbound, but destroyed. And rather than further escalate the incident, the government claims it was a "false alarm". Does anyone else feel this might be the case?
No. There is no evidence of an incoming missile. It really was just a screw up.
Damn, hard to determine which is actually scarier then :lol:

Post Reply