by hrng » Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:53 pm
Navarro wrote:SeekerOfTruth wrote:I thought flamethrowers were universally banned by the Geneva convention?
Flamethrower MLRS artillery. Not as in, a weapon that sprays out burning fuel, as seen in WW2.
Aw man, I got excited, that looked like a cool toy if it was a legit flamethrower
For the record, the legal status of flamethrowers seems vague:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... -legal.htm
If they're not targeting civilians then it may be allowed. They're more legal than white phosphorous.
[quote="Navarro"][quote="SeekerOfTruth"]I thought flamethrowers were universally banned by the Geneva convention?[/quote]
Flamethrower MLRS artillery. Not as in, a weapon that sprays out burning fuel, as seen in WW2.[/quote]
Aw man, I got excited, that looked like a cool toy if it was a legit flamethrower :D
For the record, the legal status of flamethrowers seems vague: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/incendiary-legal.htm
If they're not targeting civilians then it may be allowed. They're more legal than white phosphorous.