US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by Worldwatcher » Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:45 pm

Strategic as in geopolitically strategic, not nuclearly strategic.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by krzepice1976 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 1:00 pm

Article from defence24 need to be translated to english http://www.defence24.pl/460651,eksperci ... -i-zachodu
A summary syria is proxy war between west and russia. Us will not directly attack syria forces.us allow for supply Advanced weapon including anti Aircraft.
Syrian goverment strategy will create hundreds of terrorist.syrian goverment force civilians to ask al quida for help.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by jayfeather31 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 5:10 am

Got something new on the situation. It seems to be more of the same old, same old. This may actually have already been reported in this thread, and I have not seen it yet.

ARTICLE: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/01/middl ... index.html

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by krzepice1976 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:00 pm

TruthandJustice wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/ ... index.html

Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.
Us has few option. Placing us troop is interesting . The most interesting option is deployment medical stuff only ....
Russia can not say anything is such situation.....
One bomb on hospital Putin have problem.

Other option is use IS against Russia.
Lets addhttps://m.sputniknews.com/politics/20161001/1045909569/us-afghanistan-scenario-syria.html?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fg1voIC5l65&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=ctdu&utm_campaign=URL_shortening which means that manpds will be used.probably on theri ways. Number of strike against isis will be reduced .
With Russian strategy is it very difficult to win if paly fair.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by TruthandJustice » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:37 pm

BygmesterFinn wrote:
TruthandJustice wrote:
TruthandJustice wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/ ... index.html

Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.
I think Russia is worried about Hillary in my opinion. She might take a more aggressive approach than Obama.
By the time she gets into office, Aleppo will have fallen.
If only Gary Johnson had asked "and where is Aleppo," instead of "and what is Aleppo,"
would've been a much more thought provoking question and not the end to a campaign of someone that is not Trump or Hillary... Scattered amongst the middle east...
lmao that guy has something wrong with him he has said and done some pretty wacky things in his tenure of course you have to be nuts to even want the job

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by BygmesterFinn » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:32 pm

TruthandJustice wrote:
TruthandJustice wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/ ... index.html

Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.
I think Russia is worried about Hillary in my opinion. She might take a more aggressive approach than Obama.
By the time she gets into office, Aleppo will have fallen.
If only Gary Johnson had asked "and where is Aleppo," instead of "and what is Aleppo,"
would've been a much more thought provoking question and not the end to a campaign of someone that is not Trump or Hillary... Scattered amongst the middle east...

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by TruthandJustice » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:19 pm

TruthandJustice wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/ ... index.html

Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.
I think Russia is worried about Hillary in my opinion. She might take a more aggressive approach than Obama.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by TruthandJustice » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:07 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/ ... index.html

Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by krzepice1976 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:44 pm

BygmesterFinn wrote:
chiari wrote:Tiger paper, Tiger Piper ....
Exactly, Kerrys pissed that we can only have diplocatic tactics without military means because it would be illegal to intervene in Syria whereas Russia is there legally.
Weve been outfoxed (outbeared) in Syria
I think thay somę kin of reduction strikes against islamic state will be expected by coallision in iraq. No strikes in syria to five free hands islamic state to atack assad.problem shall be delagatwd to putin desk.

Re: US considers military options in #Syria as diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting fail.

by krzepice1976 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:40 pm

Us shall allow for supply sam missles by intersted parties(saudu arabia turkey).dot't attack isis in syria in exchange isis shall attack assad and russian.two week and russian will understand their mistake.. Łęt have saome chease fire with is in exchange for strike on assad russian .
It means us will not attack for isis till russian stop flying over aleppo.do nothing and five hot poteto in putin hand.

Top