TruthandJustice wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/ ... index.html
Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.
Us has few option. Placing us troop is interesting . The most interesting option is deployment medical stuff only ....
Russia can not say anything is such situation.....
One bomb on hospital Putin have problem.
Other option is use IS against Russia.
Lets addhttps://m.sputniknews.com/politics/20161001/1045909569/us-afghanistan-scenario-syria.html?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fg1voIC5l65&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=ctdu&utm_campaign=URL_shortening which means that manpds will be used.probably on theri ways. Number of strike against isis will be reduced .
With Russian strategy is it very difficult to win if paly fair.
[quote="TruthandJustice"]http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/01/politics/kerry-audio-recording-syria/index.html
Interesting article that supports my assertion that we will NOT go to war over Syria. However, with all of the various conflict zones going on at the same time something else could give. Their hands are tied right now because Congress won't even vote on the matter. The President can force them to vote but I don't think even he wants to engage Syria. So for anybody that complains that this government is too soft blame it on Congress. The President can only authorize military force in situations where he feels there is an immediate threat to this country. Only Congress can declare Offensive action. Syria never directly attacked us so we don't have grounds to attack them. That is why the President was able to attack ISIS only since they do pose a direct threat to the United States. What he is trying to do now is at least slow the bombing by placing US troops in harms way. If they blatantly bomb US troops and it is made official then it might get him the votes he needs in Congress.[/quote]
Us has few option. Placing us troop is interesting . The most interesting option is deployment medical stuff only ....
Russia can not say anything is such situation.....
One bomb on hospital Putin have problem.
Other option is use IS against Russia.
Lets addhttps://m.sputniknews.com/politics/20161001/1045909569/us-afghanistan-scenario-syria.html?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fg1voIC5l65&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=ctdu&utm_campaign=URL_shortening which means that manpds will be used.probably on theri ways. Number of strike against isis will be reduced .
With Russian strategy is it very difficult to win if paly fair.